TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical effectiveness of pre-treatment with Chlorhexidine in adhesive dental restorations. Systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Arbildo-Vega, Heber
AU - Rendón-Alvarado, Alfredo
AU - Cruzado-Oliva, Fredy Hugo
AU - Infantes-Ruíz, Edward
AU - Agüero-Alva, José
AU - Vásquez-Rodrigo, Hernán
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Universidad de Concepcion. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/10/13
Y1 - 2021/10/13
N2 - Objective: To determine, by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis, the clinical effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine (CHX) in adhesive dental restorations. Material and Methods: A literature search was conducted until February 2020, in the biomedical databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scielo, Science Direct, Scopus, SIGLE, LILACS, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Registry of Clinical Trials. The selection criteria of the studies were defined, which were: Randomized and controlled clinical trials, without language and time restrictions, and reporting the clinical effects (retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries) of pre-CHX treatment in adhesive dental restorations. Study risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results: The search strategy resulted in six articles of which five entered a meta-analysis. The studies reported that there was no difference in retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, and secondary caries from pre-treatment with CHX in adhesive dental restorations. Conclusion: The reviewed literature suggests that pretreatment with CHX does not influence the clinical effectiveness in adhesive dental restorations.
AB - Objective: To determine, by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis, the clinical effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine (CHX) in adhesive dental restorations. Material and Methods: A literature search was conducted until February 2020, in the biomedical databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scielo, Science Direct, Scopus, SIGLE, LILACS, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Registry of Clinical Trials. The selection criteria of the studies were defined, which were: Randomized and controlled clinical trials, without language and time restrictions, and reporting the clinical effects (retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries) of pre-CHX treatment in adhesive dental restorations. Study risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results: The search strategy resulted in six articles of which five entered a meta-analysis. The studies reported that there was no difference in retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, and secondary caries from pre-treatment with CHX in adhesive dental restorations. Conclusion: The reviewed literature suggests that pretreatment with CHX does not influence the clinical effectiveness in adhesive dental restorations.
KW - Chlorhexidine
KW - Dental restoration
KW - Dentin
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Permanent
KW - Systematic review
KW - Treatment outcome
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85117451809
U2 - 10.17126/joralres.2021.034
DO - 10.17126/joralres.2021.034
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85117451809
SN - 0719-2460
VL - 10
JO - Journal of Oral Research
JF - Journal of Oral Research
IS - 3
ER -