TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansys
AU - Bonhin, Eduardo Pires
AU - Müzel, Sarah David
AU - Oliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario de
AU - Tupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros
AU - Guidi, Erick Siqueira
AU - Silva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado
AU - Silva, Fernando de Azevedo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© (2024) International Association of Engineers. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - The utilization of composite materials in various engineering sectors has gained significant prominence due to their unique characteristics. However, owing to their inherent heterogeneity, these materials often exhibit nonlinear and unpredictable behaviors. Consequently, the finite element method has seen a growing application as an invaluable tool for analyzing composites subjected to diverse scenarios. This study aims to assess the advantages and disadvantages of ANSYS APDL and Workbench modules (specifically, ACP and Static Structural) while also examining the impact of the choice of elements in simulating composite materials. The results obtained reveal that, irrespective of the chosen method and element type, the strain patterns exhibited remarkable similarity. Nonetheless, models employing shell elements demonstrated a notable advantage, requiring fewer elements and nodes. Furthermore, the recommended model is the integrated ACP model. This preference is based in its capacity to simplify layer modeling and enable the detailed analysis of strains within each layer.
AB - The utilization of composite materials in various engineering sectors has gained significant prominence due to their unique characteristics. However, owing to their inherent heterogeneity, these materials often exhibit nonlinear and unpredictable behaviors. Consequently, the finite element method has seen a growing application as an invaluable tool for analyzing composites subjected to diverse scenarios. This study aims to assess the advantages and disadvantages of ANSYS APDL and Workbench modules (specifically, ACP and Static Structural) while also examining the impact of the choice of elements in simulating composite materials. The results obtained reveal that, irrespective of the chosen method and element type, the strain patterns exhibited remarkable similarity. Nonetheless, models employing shell elements demonstrated a notable advantage, requiring fewer elements and nodes. Furthermore, the recommended model is the integrated ACP model. This preference is based in its capacity to simplify layer modeling and enable the detailed analysis of strains within each layer.
KW - Carbon Fibers
KW - Finite Element
KW - Materials
KW - Polyphenylene Sulfide Composite
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198952516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85198952516
SN - 1819-656X
VL - 51
SP - 918
EP - 924
JO - IAENG International Journal of Computer Science
JF - IAENG International Journal of Computer Science
IS - 7
ER -